Continued use of these apps may cause your IP to be blocked indefinitely. This triggers our anti-spambot measures, which are designed to stop automated systems from flooding the site with traffic.
Some unofficial phone apps appear to be using GameFAQs as a back-end, but they do not behave like a real web browser does. 
Using GameFAQs regularly with these browsers can cause temporary and even permanent IP blocks due to these additional requests.
If you are using the Brave browser, or have installed the Ghostery add-on, these programs send extra traffic to our servers for every page on the site that you browse, then send that data back to a third party, essentially spying on your browsing habits. 
We strongly recommend you stop using this browser until this problem is corrected.
The latest version of the Opera browser sends multiple invalid requests to our servers for every page you visit. The most common causes of this issue are: You just want to pretend it is because it happens to be yours.Your IP address has been temporarily blocked due to a large number of HTTP requests. Let's not act like one assumption is more fact based than the other. You haven't provided "more evidence" that it will, you just stated an opinion. Presenting the definition of a word doesn't mean you're applying it correctly. Maybe you're right but I see nothing pointing to it being a likely outcome. You think that just because you think that. Your assumption is that people would be more willing to buy a 40 dollar game because they added a single charactor that they would have to pay 6 extra dollars for. Maybe I'm wrong but that's a reasonable thought process to have with those numbers. The fact that there are a handful out of several hundred thousand owners complaining leads me to believe most don't care. Nothing was "wild" about anything I said. My assumption is that adding a $6 dollar add-on isn't going to boost sales. Words have meaning and context is important. Probable - having more evidence for than against, or evidence that inclines the mind to belief but leaves some room for doubt I am presenting a possible solution to a PR problem, based on logic and a regard for positive outcomes for all parties involved while acknowledging no guarantee of said outcomes. The difference is you are presenting wild assumptions as facts. 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Jack Rabbit Slim:Now you're just being petty, so let me clarify something then I'm done with this tangent.
0 kommentar(er)
